Editorial boards, news outlets and experts agree: Interchange legislation is bad for consumers and bad for business.
And that means stores with a lot of small-ticket sales, such as coffee shops and gas stations, may force or coax consumers into paying with plain old cash for purchases under a certain amount, experts predict.
Omaha World-Herald
("Another twist in the fee fight," January 14, 2012)
While it makes sense for some businesses to operate on a cash-only basis, for others it could be “financial suicide,” said Ann Latham, president of Uncommon Clarity, Inc., a Massachusetts-based consulting firm.
Business News Daily
("Cash-Only Businesses Risk Alienating Customers," January 12, 2012)
Kamal Grant, owner of Sublime Doughnuts near Georgia Tech, said he fears any move to restrict plastic will drive away customers. When he did not accept American Express cards because of their high fees, Grant said, some people walked out without buying the doughnuts they had ordered.
Atlanta Journal Constitution
("Fee limits may spur cash-only rules," January 10, 2012)
The interchange fee cap also will “heighten the segmentation of consumers who can increase spending using credit cards,” [James L.] Brown said.
American Banker
("Consumer Savings from Durbin Uncertain-Advocate," January 10, 2012)
Another part of the Durbin amendment restricted banks from signing or maintaining exclusive debit-processing deals with networks. Now issuers must have agreements with at least two networks to process debit transactions on every card — a relatively complicated arrangement that is causing banks some headaches.
American Banker
("Banks Demand More Data from Networks in Durbin Push," January 9, 2012)
The law was supposed to help small retailers by providing them relief from debit card interchange fees, but the unintended consequence has been higher prices as consumers shift towards credit instead of debit.
USA Today
("View From The Wing – How the Durbin Amendment Changed Mileage Earning Checking Accounts and Debit Cards," December 24, 2011)
“But consumers have not been spared anything as the Durbin Amendment has shifted $12 billion hand-over-fist to some of the nation’s wealthiest retailers, such as Walmart, Home Depot and Walgreens — firms that all lobbied for the price controls to fatten their own pocketbooks.”
OpenMarket.org
("Dick Durbin’s Hypocritical Quest for “Honest Information’ on Bank Fees," December 20, 2011)
“What’s still missing from the retailer argument is any clear evidence that cost savings are being passed along to consumers, as merchant lobbyists promised. Maybe that will come later. But in the meantime, Congress and the Fed should steer clear of any more price fixing.”
Arizona Republic
("Dispute over debit-card fees still simmers," December 17, 2011)
“Retailers have kept at least $825 million to themselves since the Durbin Amendment was enacted in October.”
Credit Newsline
("Retailers have kept $825 million since the Durbin Amendment began," December 15, 2011)
“[Consumers] have not enjoyed any pass-through benefit from lower swipe fees in the price of retailer goods and services…”
American Banker
("Both the Merchants and the Fed Misread Durbin," December 15, 2011)